Thanks all for your responses

We've been using

reject-empty-rdns
reject-unresolvable-rdns
reject-missing-sender-mx
reject-ip-in-cc-rdns
2 dns-blacklists
and a variety of whitelist/blacklist files

and have been eliminating a bunch of these and others
what doesn't get stopped by spamdyke, usually gets
caught by spamassassin.

Further inspection, reveals these folks are seeing
the entries in their spam folders (go figure) while
those that have a liberal spam policy get the occasional
item in their inbox.

Although we have seen an increase in this type of
spam, it apparently is not as big a problem as
originally thought.

Thanks again

Greg Cirino



Marlon Klee wrote:
> Some of my customers have the same problem I was able to reduce the
> problem with
>
>
>       |reject-unresolvable-rdns|
>
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Sam Clippinger <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     I haven't seen much of this myself.  I'm not sure what spamdyke
>     could do
>     to stop this.  Obviously it could block any messages with the same
>     sender and recipient addresses, but that would prevent users from
>     emailing themselves (some MUAs include a feature to always put the
>     sender on the BCC line).
>
>     If spamdyke can't stop these messages based on their origin, it's
>     probably up to SpamAssassin (or something similar) to stop it by
>     checking the content.
>
>     -- Sam Clippinger
>
>     Greg Cirelle Enterprises wrote:
>     > We have been seeing a large increase in the type of spam
>     > having the same address in the from and to parameters.
>     >
>     > ex. from: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> to:
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ...
>     >
>     > the filters we already have in place are stopping the usual
>     > dns and black list entries, but occasionally  some get through
>     >
>     > not such a big deal but some users are begining to get cranky
>     >
>     > anyone seeing these and able to deal with them?
>     >
>     > best
>     >
>     >
>     _______________________________________________
>     spamdyke-users mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>   
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to