Carl R. Friend wrote: > May I make an appeal, on behalf of everyone using FreePort, to re- > think the wisdom of the /\d\d\@/ rule? Thanks for putting up with the > foregoing rant and your patience.
May I suggest that you get some non-spam samples of the above submitted into the mail corpus used to generate the SA rules? That would generally be a good thing anyway since it sounds like you might have unique cases. It would cause the genetic algorithm which generates those scores to reduce the points given to it since it would now have examples of that which are not spam. Bob
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
