> > 
> > Ah.  That's what I was starting to think as I typed up my 
> > original message.
> > 
> > I agree.  It seems funny to do a check for SPAM and not do 
> > any sort of check for open relay.  

I'm no expert on Received headers, but:

Received:       from 212.214.136.47 (EHLO smtp-fe2.ballou.se)
(212.214.136.47) by mta128.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2003
22:14:46 -0800
Received:       by smtp-fe2.ballou.se (Postfix, from userid 503) id
5F42490991; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:14:28 +0100 (CET)
Received:       from localhost [127.0.0.1] by smtp-fe2 with SpamAssassin
(2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:14:28 +0100

Isn't that last header saying that the outgoing mail/smtp connection
was made from a local machine, using user-id 503?



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to