-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes: >Spamcop was historically a "donation required" service, and that status >kept it out of the default test set. Spamcop now is merely a "donations >accepted" service, so I suspect it will eventually work it's way into the >test set.. I think it just boils down that it was in too late for 2.60's >testing. Since spamcop has a score, I suspect one of the developers did a >quick "mini test" to evolve a score for spamcop right before release. Yes, exactly. We actually got a few developers in on that to test it. >Policy wise, SORBS_BLOCK doesn't make much sense to use in SA... >SORBS_BLOCK isn't a list of spammers, it's a list of admins that have >demanded that SORBS not test their networks. I suspect it was included in >the code for only completeness since other SORBS checks were being handled. Yep. And the results for using that for blocking were crappy ;) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQE/qp7PQTcbUG5Y7woRAlKzAKDLWDJOu3f298RawfR/8ViJnMEFMwCdGNZ2 ZTI/14tKNtL6FV+6PIUNcmM= =geAZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
