VonEssen, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All this relies on many assumptions. We assume spammers regularly
> harvest addresses off usenet. We also assume that they clean their
> list when address appears to be bad. Has anybody tested this?

Just for grins, I just began trying it.

As we know, alot of people using things like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would assume that any spammer worth their salt could write a program
to strip out the munging.

Other more clever might use something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While better, a spammer could still nuke that.  My presumption is that a
spammer's software would look for mixed case in the address and yank out
the uppercase stuff.

So I just changed my address for this newsgroup to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a perfectly legit address with no anti-spam munging at all - it's
just using mixed case in odd places.  Let's see how many spams I get
addresses to the messed up address or (harder to measure) if my amount
of spam goes down.


--

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Chris Barnes                                       AOL IM: CNBarnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                            Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Computer Systems Manager                               ph: 979-845-7801
Department of Physics                                 fax: 979-845-2590
Texas A&M University





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to