On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:21:52AM +0000, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
> > Yes, the situation I'm talking about is lots of spamd processes running at
> > once using lots of memory. (Not to mention the local delivery processes
> > running at the same time as well)
> >
> > Spamd using 800MB of ram is a bug, and one which I've never encountered
> > yet in months of using spamd, so it's probably something to do with your
> > particular config.....(perhaps a bug or corrupt installation of your
> > version of Perl ?)
> 
> I've encountered exactly this problem ever since upgrading to 2.60;
> several times a day my system suddenly goes from having 1 or 2 spamds
> to having 40 or 50 of them. It goes into swap, the load average goes
> up to sixty or more, and the machine grinds to a halt.
> 
> I've set up a perl script to kill all spamds and restart the spamd
> service if it sees more than 10 instances, but that's a hack - I'd
> rather just see the problem solved...

We've had a similar script running since 2.55 but it hasn't triggered
since I constrainde the number of child processes allowed using the 
"-m" flag.  About 50,000 emails a week, 2/3 spam, being processed by 
a dedicated spamd server having a 600 mHz processor and 384 megs RAM.

Have you tried starting spamd with the "-m" flag to limit
the number of copies?

How much RAM are you using?

-- 
Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise 
Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room 
http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to