Simon Byrnand wrote on Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:56:54 +1200: > Likewise if a message scored -5 before whitelisting and -105 total, then it > WOULD be learnt as ham, because its pre-whitelist score was hammy. Make sense ? >
I think we discussed this some months ago here, don't remember the outcome, but I think it was concluded there should be done something. I think Carlo has a valid point. Learning of already whitelisted messages as ham or spam may be undesirable at all, although it uses the pre-white/blacklist scoring. But it's questionable if more than a few people would ever use it. Carlo, you can suggest adding options like "whitelist-noautolearn" and "blacklist-noautolearn" via Bugzilla. If it gets in is up to the developers. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk