Simon Byrnand wrote on Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:56:54 +1200:

> Likewise if a message scored -5 before whitelisting and -105 total, then it 
> WOULD be learnt as ham, because its pre-whitelist score was hammy. Make sense ?
>

I think we discussed this some months ago here, don't remember the outcome, but I 
think it was concluded there should be done something. I think Carlo has a valid 
point. Learning of already whitelisted messages as ham or spam may be undesirable 
at all, although it uses the pre-white/blacklist scoring. But it's questionable 
if more than a few people would ever use it.
Carlo, you can suggest adding options like "whitelist-noautolearn" and 
"blacklist-noautolearn" via Bugzilla. If it gets in is up to the developers.


Kai

-- 

Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to