On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:56:54AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> On the other hand, there is nothing to stop the message being autolearnt if 
> its score before the whitelisting value is added, so for example if a spam 
> would normally score 20 and be autolearnt, and you for some reason 
> whitelisted the spammer, their final score would be -80 and the message 
> would not be tagged as spam, but it WOULD be learnt as spam. (Because it is 
> spam)

:(

That is not what I want though.

Take for example this mailinglist, this very mail, it is full of words
like "whitelist", "SpamAssassin", "autolearnt", "score", "man pages"
etc.  If you included a SPAM as example (quite possible on this list,
and the reason why I whitelist it) then I still don't want it to be
autolearnt: that would mean that the mentioned words get tagged as
spammy, and they are not.

Learning mails that *discuss* spam as being spam will make the Bayesian
classifier less accurate.

We really need a way to stop certain (white listed) mail to be auto-learned
at all as spam or ham - ever.

> There was a "bug" in older versions where I think the man pages were 
> installed to a *different* path than older verisons of SpamAssassin, so if 
> you started with 2.4x and then updated later to 2.5x (I think that was it) 
> then your man command could be looking at the old version.
> 
> Have a search in the various man paths on your system and see if you can 
> find old versions of the man pages and delete them...

Thanks!  That was indeed the case!
I now removed the old man pages.

> >Your webpage http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
> >says
> 
> It's not "our" web page, both Kai and myself are end users, just like you :)

Then where should I post when I want to convince the maintainers of SA
to never autolearn a whitelisted mail? :)

Mails on a list like this can easily score as spam, but - in the same
message - might contain a lot of valuable words/tokens and that does
screw up the Bayesian database when learning it as spam.

Perhaps a 'never_autolearn_whitelist_to' should be added?

-- 
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to