If you upgrade to 2.60 you need to set your autolearn ham score to 0,
instead of the default of -2 in 2.55.

By default shouldn't the auto-learn threshold for 2.60 be set to 0?
(not at a shell prompt so can't look right now.)
If not I think it should be, otherwise it won't learn ham.

--Luke


As
   "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:

> There's never been any sort of minimum.
>
> However, in 2.60-rc3 there are very few negative scoring rules. It would
> be
> considerably less common for a message to get a sub-zero score.. Check a
> message from someone that's whitelisted, or has a Habeas SWE header in it.
>
> 2.55 had about 64 rules with negative scores. 2.60-rc3 has 13.
>
> $ grep "score" 50_scores.cf | grep - | grep -v \#
>
> score RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER  -0.1  -0.1
> score RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED   -4.3  -4.3
> score USER_IN_WHITELIST -100.000
> score USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST -15.000
> score USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO -6.000
> score USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO -20.000
> score USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO -100.000
> score HABEAS_SWE -8.0
> score BAYES_00   -4.901 -4.900
> score BAYES_01   -0.600 -1.524
> score BAYES_10   -0.734 -0.908
> score BAYES_20   -0.127 -1.428
> score BAYES_30   -0.349 -0.904
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to