Hi Louis,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Louis LeBlanc > Sorry for barging in on this thread, but I'm trying to get this > working myself right now (spamd/spamc with procmail). I have one > question though. Join the party! > Regarding spamc, if the -f flag us used and it can't connect to > spamd, it returns without an exitcode set. Do you use this fact to > run the message through spamassassin as a backup? If not, do you > know whether this is possible? Honestly, I don't know. It is a good point and I would like to know the answer myself. I have not been using the -f flag. I have tested it though and if spamd is down, the message is still processed. Anyone know the answer to this? > Right now, I use the following in ~/.procmailrc: > > :0fw > * !^Subject:.*SAtalk > | spamassassin -a > > And for spamd/spamc, I'd probably use something like this: > > spamd -a -c -d > > and in ~/.procmailrc: > :0fw > * !^Subject:.*SAtalk > | spamc -u LOGNAME > > What I'd like to do is check to see if spamd managed to tag a message > and if not, pipe it through the old spamassassin -a above (I could > probably just check for the X-Spam-Flag: header and pipe it through > if it doesn't exist). I still want to use per/user configs and bayes > dbs in either case. > > Can you tell me if I'm totally off here? I can't see your entire Procmail script and I really don't understand the mechanics of your system. It looks like you are trying to pipe to spamc through a site-wide configuration. If so, how are you getting the username for the -u option? I can think of how to perform a sitewide Procmail/SA solution with a user-based Procmail/SA solution but that would ential sending the message through SA twice. There is then a way to perform a site-wide only solution as well as a per-user only solution. What are you really trying to do? My opinion . . . I think a combo site-wide and per-user solution is overkill. You should probablly stick to one or the other. Furthermore, I just don't see the need for a per-user solution unless you are forced to do it, like an ISP. Again these are just my opinions. If anyone has insight to counter my belief, I would love to be educated. --Larry ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
