On 08/28/03 11:08 PM, Larry Gilson sat at the `puter and typed: > First, I use Procmail rather than the spamfilter script. The concept is > similar but my experience with the script is limited. > > I had found a link to SecuritySage that might help you best. > > http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_sa.html > > > I will continue to help if you think it would be beneficial. But I think > you should visit the link above as they have a working template that can > better relate to your configuration. > > > --Larry
Hey Larry (and everyone), Sorry for barging in on this thread, but I'm trying to get this working myself right now (spamd/spamc with procmail). I have one question though. Regarding spamc, if the -f flag us used and it can't connect to spamd, it returns without an exitcode set. Do you use this fact to run the message through spamassassin as a backup? If not, do you know whether this is possible? Right now, I use the following in ~/.procmailrc: :0fw * !^Subject:.*SAtalk | spamassassin -a And for spamd/spamc, I'd probably use something like this: spamd -a -c -d and in ~/.procmailrc: :0fw * !^Subject:.*SAtalk | spamc -u LOGNAME What I'd like to do is check to see if spamd managed to tag a message and if not, pipe it through the old spamassassin -a above (I could probably just check for the X-Spam-Flag: header and pipe it through if it doesn't exist). I still want to use per/user configs and bayes dbs in either case. Can you tell me if I'm totally off here? TIA Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ Miksch's Law: If a string has one end, then it has another end. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
