I've had SA 2.55 with bayes running for some time
now, and I'd like to take it a bit further. Here's what I'm wondering and
thinking...I'd like to know if others do similar spam maintenance and if they
could respond back with the best methods for gaining useful info from my
spam.
- I've got two collections of mail...spam and
ham. I already train bayes, but I'd like to use these for more indepth
reports. I'd like to be able to add new rules to a temp (non-active)
config file, and get feedback on how many messages would get flagged with my new
rule...and also how many it might flag with the non-spam corpus.
- I'd like to be able to create a quick ranking of
the most popular rules, and also the least popular rules that get used on these
corpuses. I think that might be useful for adjusting scores to custom-fit
my spam.
- I'd like to get feedback on my range of hits...to
see what the average number my spam draws, and consider if I need to adjust my
general limit (right now I've got it set at 5.5 with global rules in place, no
individual rules). Also, I'd like to learn what my average hammessage
ranks.
- Feedback on domains would be fantastic, but I'm
not sure if this is best suited for SA or my mailer (qmail with vpopmail for the
user accounts)...get to know what the most popular domains that are sending me
spam...
I know there's a few things in the tools directory
of SA, but I was hoping to hear some specific examples of how to accomplish
these tasks. Also, it'd be great to hear of any other management/upkeep
that admins run on a regular basis to get a better handle on their
situation.
Thanks...
...ken
|
- Re: [SAtalk] Useful reporting with SA Ken Winke
- Re: [SAtalk] Useful reporting with SA Matt Kettler
- Re: [SAtalk] Useful reporting with SA Ken Winke
- Re: [SAtalk] Useful reporting with SA Matt Kettler
- Re: [SAtalk] Useful reporting with SA Ken Winke
- Re: [SAtalk] Useful reporting with SA Rob Chanter
- RE: [SAtalk] Useful reporting with SA Chris Santerre
- Re: [SAtalk] Useful reporting with SA Ken Winke