On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:38:11AM -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote: > Aha! So if I modify my .procmailrc file so it uses spamassassin instead of > spamc then it WILL read my rules, right?
Yes. > What is the difference between spamc and spamassassin? Is this the only > difference? Can I safely replace 'spamc' by 'spamassassin' in my > .procmailrc? See "man spamd". But basically, spamc/spamd is much more efficient than "spamassassin" since spamd daemonizes, then spamc calls it to scan mails, instead of having spamassassin try to start up for each and every message. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Yeah, that's it! I was right! It's reality that has it wrong!" - Jim Toth
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
