On Thursday 31 July 2003 03:25 pm, Gary Funck wrote: > As you can see there's extensive use of a white font color which obscures > the many random words that have been inserted in order to subvert signature > checking.
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 > tests=AWL,HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE, > HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no > version=2.60-cvs Hmmmm, maybe we should make some new rules that test the ratio of invisible text to visible text? Or the number of words/bytes of invisible text? Ratio of invisble text size plus HTML tag size to total message size? -- Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. Advanced SPAM filtering software: http://spamassassin.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
