At 12:45 -0700 2003-07-28, Vicki Brown wrote:
>At 07:44 -0400 2003-07-28, Gilson, Larry wrote:
>>You might want to read the FAQ below.
>>It does not specifically answer your question
>knowing a bit more about the precise class of problem (i.e. spammer is
>pretending to be internal), it could be made to help...
>
>I might be able to work with it; e.g. I can raise the score for anything
>spoofed as being in our net that isn't legitimate... but that's still a
>workround, methinks
>
>By the way, do NOT implement the the solution as provided in the FAQ without
>being very specific with machine names or exact IP addresses.  The spammer
>in my situation is spoofing the 192.168 net!

>

Nope. I don't think I can use rules here. The 192.168.*.* (or 10.*.*.*) nets
are legitimate in the Received lines. They may or may not be internal but
they could easily be legitimate. I can't just assume that anything Received
from 192.168 that doesn't match our boxes IPs is bad.

This has to be solved inside SpamAssassin's AWL checking.

-- 
- Vicki

Vicki Brown     ZZZ                   Journeyman Sourceror:
P.O. Box 1269      zz  |\     _,,,---,,_         Scripts & Philtres
San Bruno, CA       zz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_     Perl, Unix, MacOS
94066     USA         |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'   http://philtres.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)   http://www.cfcl.com/vlb


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to