At 10:07 AM 7/17/2003 +0200, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
I am thinking about topics like "What is better: A cluster with
a single MX, or multiple machines with separate MXes?" "What
trust can be put into the name that comes after a HELO
statement? Can we demand that it resolves?" "If my secondary
gets a mail while the primary is reachable from the secondary,
should the secondary 4xx the incoming message?"

Where would I go with questions like these?


I don't know of a forum but one of these is just in the RFC 2821 specs:

Per RFC spec the string following the HELO does not need to be resolvable, although it should be a FQDN when meaningful. see 4.1.1.1. You can demand that it resolves, but you'll loose the ability to communicate with some properly configured MX'es.

From which you can infer "absolutely zero trust can be put in the HELO'ed name." but that should be common sense.. you can trust almost nothing in a SMTP transaction.











-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the
same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to