I have just set up sa and have noticed the same situation. The -t and -s option problem I mean. Haven't noticed any issues with scanning large messages (maildrop won't pass it sa if it is over 128k anyways). Are the command line argument issues known bugs or what?
-Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kai MacTane Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Attachment Checks At 7/9/03 04:21 PM , Abigail Marshall wrote: >I'm glad that it doesn't happen to you, Simon. It happens to >lots of other people. I can't reliably run Spamassassin on >files over 30K, much less 100K. This probably depends on >individual system configuration, as well as other programs >and load on an individual server. I've also been having trouble with running spamc/spamd on large files, though I have yet to profile just how large is large enough to give it a problem. It also doesn't seem to care if I use the -t or -s flags to spamc -- even with "spamc -t 90", I still get spamc processes just hanging around, sometimes for days at a time. --Kai MacTane ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Uh-oh... Gravity works." --Batty Koda, "Ferngully" (Hey, bats are gothic.) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk