Yes, I already run TMDA, and I agree with you.
I'm just wondering if this technique that the spammers seem to be using will spell the end of SpamAssassin's usefulness. That would be a shame, but I can't think of any way around it.
"You haven't been reading the success stories," he asked sweetly; "have you?" he added knowingly.
*There is no way spammers will beat SA*. Upgrade your software and adjust your attitude :-) Read what people like Theo and Justin write. Read my own practical experience with 2.60-CVS.
*Nothing* is getting past my setup, albeit with my own extraporn and Swiss Watch rules - and umpteen redundant others (I should clean up my redundant rules a little.) And no false negatives nor false positives, either. And no, I don't use TMDA - whatever it is (I don't care anyway, so don't bother.)
Best,
Tony
-- Tony Earnshaw
Humor him and he'll go away
http://j-walk.com/blog/docs/conference.htm http://www.billy.demon.nl Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
