On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 12:08:55AM +0200, Lisa Keiser wrote: > Yes, you are right... you have to modify rules and/or add own rules... > > > Cheers, Lisa Keiser
Well, I'm certainly willing and able to modify rules, but that's not the case for lots of SpamAssassin users. Part of this software's appeal is its relative ease of use. If this spamming technique catches on, the manual tweaking of rules in order to make SpamAssassin useful against it would lower the software's overall desirability. But sadly, I can't think of any way around this within SpamAssassin itself (i.e., without having to use other software such as TMDA). > > Over the past several weeks, I've noticed an increasing amount of > > spam that is getting through SpamAssassin with scores in the 4.0-4.9 > > range. This makes me wonder if perhaps some spammers have started to > > taylor their spams as follows: run the default version of > > SpamAssassin, feed their messages through it, and keep tweaking the > > messages until SpamAssassin lets them through. > > > > Does anyone else think that this could be possible? It seems to me > > that this process could be easily automated, or at least > > semi-automated. -- Spam Assassin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
