I don't have any information about this either, only a thought. If I contributed code to an open source project like SA, I'm contributing it under the conditions of whatever licensing scheme(s) the project already utilizes.
Yes, this is the case for SA.. a very simple grep of the code shows many copyright holders.
grep -ri copyright *
Justin Mason, Daniel Quinlan, Craig Hughes, Brad Jorsch, James Henstridge, Gertjan van Noord, Malte S. Stretz all appear in copyright statements in various parts of the code and utilities.
One part of the code also declares it uses a regexp from another package which is copyright of Graham Barr.
John L. Allen also appears as a "no copyright" declaree.
I may have missed some others, but I think I got em all.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
