On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 22:36, Bob Apthorpe wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Andrew Allison wrote: > > > My Web host uses SpamAssassin to filter e-mail, but quite a bit gets > > through. I've looked at the FAQs and don't find a mechanism for a Windows > > (2000) user to submit the offending e-mails for inclusion in the filtering. > > Is there one? > > No. Very simply, SpamAssassin has a large library of patterns (rules) that > it checks mail against. Those patterns are assigned scores by analyzing a > large body of spam and non-spam at the time a new version of SpamAssassin > is released. The rules and scores are updated persiodically (with each new > version) but not dynamically, and my understanding is there's no means of > submitting spam to the testing corpus without being an active SA > developer. If this isn't correct, I'm sure someone will tactfully clarify > matters... :)
From time to time, people post offending messages to this list, but I've never seen that this is really appreciated. In any case, so short before 2.50 is released, with a much better rulebase (they say - didn't test it yet), it doesn't make much sense submitting spam not caught by 2.43 (which I assume you have). (No, I'm not a sa developer either) cheers -- vbi -- featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/subkeys
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part