On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:31:39PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > I haven't seen SA 2.43 output any "run_rbl_eval_test" lines with the > -D switch although it was surely doing rbl-tests (given the delay and > the fact that it was running with default settings, oh, and the rules > it scored, of course). That's why I wrote "Not in ....".
Oh. Yes, that was 2.43.
$ spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 2.43
$ spamassassin -D < 1 > /dev/null
...
debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_DSBL ======> got hit
debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM ======> got hit
debug: Ran run_rbl_eval_test rule RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL ======> got hit
...
:)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
signal(i, SIG_DFL); /* crunch, crunch, crunch */
-- Larry Wall in doarg.c from the perl source code
msg12077/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
