[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > This brings me to a newbie question. If we're running spamd, is there any > need to even have the spamassassin script? All the man pages seem to > indicate that spamc is a drop-in replacement for the script if you're > running spamd. I just want to make sure before I do something like chmod > 0 spamassassin.
Well, it's handy for doing things like reporting spam, etc. > There's also a binary in the bin directory simply called "spam" It looks > like it was built a day after spamc, spamd and spamassassin. Is this a > dependancy, part of the distribution or neither? dunno, sounds like a botched "cp" command ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek Presents Now! Green Lasers, Hip Geek T-Shirts, Remote Control Tanks, Caffeinated Soap, MP3 Players, XBox Games, Flying Saucers, WebCams, Smart Putty. T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
