* Albert Croft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Question 1: > What has the performance of spamassassin (particularly the > spamc/spamd combination) been like for mailservers handling > medium-to-large quantities of in-bound mail (i.e., averaging on the > order of tens of thousands or more emails per day)? In particular, in > those arrangements where sendmail acted as the MTA, or as a > scan-and-forward server to the final MTA. Have specific configurations > been found to be more effective and efficient? What are some of the > sizes of some of the larger sites using spamassassin?
We're using Postfix, since sendmail is too slow for us. http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/postfix/enterprise_spam_tagging.shtml This setup uses amavisd-new with SA and a virusscanner. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite Campus Mitte Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 When a foundation is built on crap then life is sh*t. However, sh*t is a proctologist's bread and butter. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
