Two questions, which I hope someone may be able to point me in the
direction of resources for.
Question 1:
What has the performance of spamassassin (particularly the
spamc/spamd combination) been like for mailservers handling
medium-to-large quantities of in-bound mail (i.e., averaging on the
order of tens of thousands or more emails per day)? In particular, in
those arrangements where sendmail acted as the MTA, or as a
scan-and-forward server to the final MTA. Have specific configurations
been found to be more effective and efficient? What are some of the
sizes of some of the larger sites using spamassassin?
Question 2:
Does the protocol use for communication between spamc and spamd
support the ability to "stream" multiple messages, or must a connection
be opened for each individual email arriving. If not, would the ability
to do so provide any kind of performance improvement? Would such an
improvement, if present, be worth the additional complexity such
capability would likely add?
Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.
Sincerely,
Albert Croft
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
- [SAtalk] question regarding resolution of potential usern... Albert Croft
- Re: [SAtalk] question regarding spamc/spamd performa... Albert Croft
- Re: [SAtalk] question regarding spamc/spamd perf... Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: [SAtalk] question regarding spamc/spamd ... Kelsey Cummings
- Re: [SAtalk] question regarding spamc/spamd perf... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [SAtalk] question regarding spamc/spamd ... Justin Mason