Justin Mason said the following on 11/12/02 23:08:
One other thing I've been thinking about is somehow storing SA results "live", and allowing them to be modified by sa-learn/forget etc. The results could be stored in a format that makes evolve happy (or easily mangleable to that format), and we could then get users to generate their own score sets.Kurt Andersen said:Seen this blurb from today? I can't quite figure out how I feel about it.yeah, me too. Both are SpamAssassin btw. IMO, it's overall a good thing as (a) it lets legit publishers avoid relatively-obvious trouble areas (like talking about spam laws etc.) (b) it lures spammers into a false sense of security, as once they send their spam the massive quantity of forged headers will give them away anyway ;) (c) the Bayesian stuff will soon muddy the waters quite a bit more.
(Yes I know they can do this today by keeping all their spam/ham, but it might be worth allowing users to do this trivially).
Just a random thought though, and definitely not something I'm going to work on in the short term :-)
Matt.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
