Michael Stenner said: > I hope this helps. I want to reiterate: Most people probably aren't > interested in this ability. In our case, we want user configs, user > AWL, and to allow users to invoke spamc directly. That means that > without some sort of authentication, they can do bad things to each > other. Not REALLY bad things, but clear violations that can get > annoying. A few lines of code (maybe 30) allows me to prevent it. > The load increase is acceptable. Easy call.
BTW I've applied a patch for auth-ident (probably from Mike ;) already in CVS. I agree that this is a valuable option to have, for folks who have semi-trustable users on the spamc-invoking box. --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
