Does anyone have an eval rule for an invalid encoding header?  I often see
spam with this pattern:

From: Roland Contomichalos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ultimate HGH 1000 - Lose Weight while you sleep
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 11:35:14 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Type: text/html
X-Spam-Prev-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjx0aXRsZT5VbHRpbWF0ZSBIR0ggMTAwMCAtIExvc2Ugd2VpZ2h0
IHdoaWxlIHlvdSBzbGVlcDwvdGl0bGU+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keSBiZ2NvbG9yPSIjRkZG
RkYiPg0KPHRhYmxlIGJvcmRlcj0wIGFsaWduPSJjZW50ZXIiIHdpZHRoPTgwJT4NCjx0cj4N
..............

Note that is was originally sent as text/html, but seems to be base64 encoded
in the body.  That inconsistency is what I want to detect.  I'm using
SpamAssassin 2.31 (I'm not able to upgrade right now).

Erik



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to