I am still of the opinion that the onus us upon the mass mailers to legitimize their messages. I get other news letters that do not have to be whitelisted. They send a short list of text synopses with hyperlink's to the full story, so I only get blasted with ads (except I use guidescope [www.guidescope.com] and pop-up stopper [www.panicware.com] to squash most of them) if I want to read more.
-----Original Message----- From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft developer newsletter tagged as spam On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, SpamTalk wrote: > It _IS_ spam. The fact it is from M$DN does not mitigate the fact that > they take advantage of having your email address to load all that crap > in the same boat. It's not spam unless they send it unsolicited. The point is merely that a high SA content score does not mean the mail was not asked for -- and if, for example, an ISP were to choose to deploy an SMTP-time block using SA, they risk intercepting legitimate mail. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
