I've long been of the philosophy that spamassassin should focus on exactly one thing: identification and tagging of spam. Leave the delivery to something which does delivery well. Leave the SMTP to something which does SMTP well. etc, etc, etc. I haven't chopped out the delivery stuff altogether, but have been sorely tempted to.
C On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 05:14 PM, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > On Thursday 11 July 2002 19:17 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:08:40PM -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote: >>> Thanks, that worked. BTW, what is it's purpose and why is it >>> generated >>> by default? Just curious. >> [...] >> >> Although in thinking about it, people don't really use SA for delivery >> any more, so we should probably just not add the From line and let >> procmail (or insert your favorite program here) handle the From line. >> [...] > > Full ACK :o) > > Malte > > -- > -- Coding is art. > -- > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & more > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
