On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > It's far too common to equate "sender sent a message I consider junkmail" > > with "sender should therefore be prevented from sending mail to anyone I > > can manage to stop him from sending mail to." > > Depending on the situation, that may or may not be a correct choice.
Which returns us by a roundabout route to the "spam criteria" part of this thread, my point being that any single person's idea of what constitutes junkmail isn't an ideal criteria for making a choice that affects others. On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Bob Proulx wrote: > Isn't that the premise behind ORBS (open relay behavior-modification > system)? Use peer pressure to make them modify their behavior? Not the same. "Open relay" can be defined without reference to personal opinion. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it's good to be a geek. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
