>>>>> "r" == rOD <rODbegbie> writes: r> Jeremy Zawodny wrote: >> Right, his rule would only trigger if SA had already decided it was >> SPAM. So it's not *that* bad. I wonder how often you'd see PORN >> rules triggered in non-porn spam. That's the only problem, right?
r> Quite often, I'm afraid. PORN_* matches 753/4129 of my nonspam corpus. r> But maybe I just have dirty friends :) But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam as well? _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
