On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 09:40:14PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: | On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:39:28PM -0400, Don Bivens wrote: | > | > | For certain items, e.g. porn, I would like to send | > | these to /dev/null. | > | > :0 | > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes | > * ^X-Spam-Status:.*PORN | > /dev/null | > | > (IOW, if it's spam and it triggered a porn rule, save it in the | > bit-bucket) | | Careful though, the PORN rules are just as likely (or even more | likely) to give false positives as many other rules. Be careful!
I thought about that ... (you need to be careful regardless when you
file stuff in the bit-bucket). I think that if the mesasge was spam
*and* triggered a porn rule, then you're *probably* safe. If the
message wasn't flagged as spam, then the porn rule was probably
incorrectly tripped.
-D
--
Commit to the Lord whatever you do,
and your plans will succeed.
Proverbs 16:3
GnuPG key : http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/public_key.gpg
msg06094/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
