I'll state the obvious and say that spammers could then latch onto this and
use it stop bypass filters.

I am of the opinion that no score would be better than a very negative
score. Very negative scores should only be reserved for content that cannot
be forged (whitelisted addresses) or would be stupid for a spammer to
include ('ie. "This is blatent spam, don't buy anything from this e-mail" in
the subject...).

The negative score could be close to zero, so that a quite a few negative
scores would be required to tip the scales, so a spammer can't just include
a key phrase to bypass the filter.


"Jeremy Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 10:00:24AM -0700, Marsha Hanchrow wrote:
>
> > This is the accounting I got for a standard, boring, and completely
> > legitimate response to an e-Bay question.  These things previously
> > got negative scores.  Every such response will earn 5 of these 5.6
> > points - only the 0.6 points for NO_REAL_NAME is specific to this
> > particular piece of mail.
>
> Many moons ago, I submitted this rule (from my local config) to
> counteract such problems:
>
>   header   Q_FOR_SELLER         Subject =~ /Question for seller/
>   describe Q_FOR_SELLER         Subject is eBay Question for seller
>   score    Q_FOR_SELLER         -4.0
>
> I'd have to go back through the archives, but I thought the intent was
> to test it out in the GA at some point...
>
> Jeremy
> --
> Jeremy D. Zawodny     |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
>
> _______________________________________________________________
>
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm





_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to