On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 10:00:24AM -0700, Marsha Hanchrow wrote: > This is the accounting I got for a standard, boring, and completely > legitimate response to an e-Bay question. These things previously > got negative scores. Every such response will earn 5 of these 5.6 > points - only the 0.6 points for NO_REAL_NAME is specific to this > particular piece of mail.
Many moons ago, I submitted this rule (from my local config) to counteract such problems: header Q_FOR_SELLER Subject =~ /Question for seller/ describe Q_FOR_SELLER Subject is eBay Question for seller score Q_FOR_SELLER -4.0 I'd have to go back through the archives, but I thought the intent was to test it out in the GA at some point... Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
