On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 01:11:26PM -0700, Chris Petersen wrote: > dunno. when I was exploring razor as a solution, I read a relatively > large number of complaints in their mailing list archive about false > positives (though "it's slow" seemed to be more of a concern to most > people)
false positive does not necessarily mean someone is exploiting the use of hashes. false positives just means that people are reporting incorrect things to razor. there seems to be lots of people, either intentionally or not, that report mailing lists, standard output from cron, etc. I would be extremely surprised if two people report different messages that result in the same hash. Although completely possible, it's also very very unlikely. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "CS... You guys are hopeless anyway..." - Prof. Farr _______________________________________________________________ Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program. Now that’s a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
