> Is it a properly formatted header according to the relevant RFCs? If > not, this entry in an ACL in my exim.conf rejects it at SMTP time.
not sure there. presumably it's all ok. > If you want, how about coming up with a test like exim's that looks > for syntactic validity of the header. All real messages will have > proper headers. There are valid reasons for Undisclosed Recipients in > the To: header (think Bcc of a newsletter or something). I know that there are valid reasons (I have a friend who uses bcc's for all of her mass-emails-to-friends stuff), but isn't that the point of using a scoring system? I get WAY more undisclosed.recipients@ messages from spammers than I do from mailing lists (most of which either just don't have a To field, or include the list address, or some generic list name) or friends... anyway, just a suggestion. It's a "check" on a variety of other spam filters that I've seen, so I thought I'd mention it. -Chris _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
