Chris Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > anyway, just a suggestion. It's a "check" on a variety of other spam > filters that I've seen, so I thought I'd mention it.
We already have both a check for valid undisclosed recipients and invalid ones. I recently tweaked the invalid one to match more messages too. It's a good use of time to check other spam filters for ideas (I've done it too), but please do check the CVS tree to see if SA already has an equivalent rule. - Dan _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
