On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Daniel Pittman wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: >> >>>Michael Moncur wrote: >> [...] >> >>>Anything using src=cid: should be treated very suspiciously as a >>>virus. That's what you've been sent (Either Klez or BadTrans - not >>>sure without seeing the subject of the email). >> >> src:cid is the standard way of referencing included image files in an >> HTML email message. Which, I think, is obnoxious, especially since >> it's used to include a corporate logo nine times in nine... ...but it >> is a reasonable use (by the standard) that's operating by design and >> requires only a point-and-click email to be written. My previous job, >> before we parted ways, had mandated the inclusion of a graphical logo >> in the signature of all HTML email, incidentally, that required >> people include an inline image. That means that /every/ corporate >> email would hit your src:cid rule... > > Sorry, I should have been clear. I was only talking about src:cid > within an IFRAME or FRAME.
Right. That I fully support. :) > I think it's almost impossible to author an email with a standard > email client that puts in an IFRAME. But I could be very wrong No, you are right. They don't tend to show up very much at all. > (heck, I use pine as my emailer, so I know bugger all about nasty > windows clients)... Only Unix ones, huh? Pine ... never appealed to me. Daniel -- The average man doesn't want to be free. He wants to be safe. -- H.L. Mencken _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk