Daniel Pittman wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > >>Michael Moncur wrote: > > > [...] > > >>Anything using src=cid: should be treated very suspiciously as a >>virus. That's what you've been sent (Either Klez or BadTrans - not >>sure without seeing the subject of the email). > > > src:cid is the standard way of referencing included image files in an > HTML email message. Which, I think, is obnoxious, especially since it's > used to include a corporate logo nine times in nine... > > ...but it is a reasonable use (by the standard) that's operating by > design and requires only a point-and-click email to be written. > > My previous job, before we parted ways, had mandated the inclusion of a > graphical logo in the signature of all HTML email, incidentally, that > required people include an inline image. > > That means that /every/ corporate email would hit your src:cid rule...
Sorry, I should have been clear. I was only talking about src:cid within an IFRAME or FRAME. I think it's almost impossible to author an email with a standard email client that puts in an IFRAME. But I could be very wrong (heck, I use pine as my emailer, so I know bugger all about nasty windows clients)... Matt. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk