On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:00:05PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> Right up to the point that someone institutes the architecture for
>> secure mail relay that the combination of TLS and certificate
>> verification provide -- /that/ can't be transparently proxied...
>
> Ahhh - but they wouldn't be allowed to do that under their contract
> would they :-)
Oh, I see your point now.
> We have this situation here in New Zealand. Some ISPs have different
> service options - the cheapest option redirects all web traffic and
> blocks SMTP (I guess they could have redirected it too). You pay extra
> for more functionality... (i.e. "what? You need to run a SMTP
> client??, that makes you a business customer... cha-CHING!)
Here in Australia any server at all makes you a business customer. I
have been doing that so long I keep forgetting that there are other
options. ;)
Daniel
--
Rules make the learner's path long, examples make it short and successful.
-- Seneca
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
