On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Smith, Rick wrote: > How long do you think it will be until users of SA face the same > consequences as the now infamous ORBZ case ? Forever, plus one day. > > I'm sure that some lawyer out there could find a way to sue someone for > running this package. > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Ma... Bill Becker
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Jun... Rob McMillin
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech /... Olivier Nicole
- [SAtalk] Re: Freedom of Press / Spee... Daniel Pittman
- Re: [SAtalk] Re: Freedom of Pre... Jason Haar
- [SAtalk] Re: Freedom of Pre... Daniel Pittman
- Re: [SAtalk] Re: Freedom of... Duncan Findlay
- Re: [SAtalk] Re: Freedom of... dman
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (y... Kenneth Chen
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (y... Peter W. Sachs, Esq.
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (y... Bill Becker
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (y... Jason Kohles
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Ma... Matthew Cline
- Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Jun... Duncan Findlay
- [SAtalk] -W limitation/problem (whitelis... Tony L. Svanstrom
- Re: [SAtalk] -W limitation/problem (... Craig Hughes
- Re: [SAtalk] -W limitation/prob... Tony L. Svanstrom
- Re: [SAtalk] -W limitation/... Craig Hughes
- Re: [SAtalk] -W limitation/... Tony L. Svanstrom
- Re: [SAtalk] -W limitation/... Craig Hughes
- Re: [SAtalk] -W limitation/... Duncan Findlay