On 03/11/2002 20:30:17, Michael Moncur wrote: (Re: "spam" rules with negative weights)
> Apparently these rules are either no longer significant spam indicators or, > in extreme cases, have become non-spam indicators. The mind boggles. How could the presence of "$$$" carry any weight _against_ an e-mail being spam? I understand the algorithm ran against a large statistical sample, but perhaps some rules should not be allowed to go negative (or positive, in the case of obvious non-spam rules), leading to an adjustment of the other numbers. Where can I find out more about the weighting algorithm? I haven't come up with anything poking around spamassassin.org (but I have been known to miss the obvious before). (Re: rule for meta tag indicating MS FrontPage) > Didn't someone already add a rule for this? It's not in the version 2.11 production release, or at least I did a case-insensitive grep of the rules directory for "meta" and "frontpage", and both searches turned up empty. | Forrest Cahoon | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |------------------------------| | 850 21st Ave SE |----------------------| Only unbalanced people | | Mpls MN 55414-2514 | | can tip the scales... | _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
