> How were these weightings arrived at? Shouldn't they be positive? The scores were assigned by the GA (genetic algorithm) that determines the effectiveness of rules based on a large group of spam and non-spam messages. Apparently these rules are either no longer significant spam indicators or, in extreme cases, have become non-spam indicators.
> 1) look for data being passed on an href, or a cgi-bin url: > > :0 B: > * (href|src)=[^?>]*(\?|/cgi-bin/) > IN.junk_hrefdata SA has a few HREF and CGI rules, generally more specific. I wouldn't want to mark all CGI URLs as spam. > 2) All e-mail made with MS FrontPage is spam: Didn't someone already add a rule for this? -- michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ "Research is the process of going up alleys to see if they are blind." -- Marston Bates _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
