On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Forrest Cahoon wrote:
> I just started using SpamAssassin, and it seems very effective.
> 
> I have noticed that some of the rules which would logically seem to
> indicate that a message *is* spam have negative weightings, e.g.:

Others already explained that the GA develops the scores.

[...]

> body   How dear can you be if you don't know my name?  DEAR_FRIEND -0.242

This is a regular feature in emails from certain countries, notably
India. The level of politeness is a culturally significant thing and as
they become more and more involved in the Internet world, this test
becomes useless for distinguishing SPAM.

[...]


> BTW, here are some rules from my old homebrew procmail filter that
> don't appear to be in SpamAssassin:
> 
> 1) look for data being passed on an href, or a cgi-bin url:

That would make every single mailing list subscription confirmation from
Mailman, Sympa and a couple of other list managers look much more like
SPAM.

Not to mention most solicited "preference change" things from websites.

[...]

> 2) All e-mail made with MS FrontPage is spam:

Lucky you -- you never got to work with people who used Frontpage
exclusively for building HTML content and mailed it around as vital
text. :)

        Daniel

-- 
It's disconcerting to realize how little you have to say to
someone who once occupied such a prominent place in your bed.
        -- Sue Grafton

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to