On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 07:45:20AM -0600, Scott Walde wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > > > > If you delete one path, delete /etc/mail/spamassassin. I don't know what > > > distribution has /etc/mail and what software supports this, but Debian > > > certainly does not. (Wouldn't it be stupid to have an /etc/mail with just > > > spamassassin stuff in it?) > > > > www:/etc/mail# pwd > > /etc/mail > > > > www:/etc/mail# ls > > Makefile > > deny.db > > sendmail.cf > > access > > name_allow > > trusted-users > > access.db > > <SNIP... point made: more than spamassassin> > > > > www:/etc/mail# cat /etc/issue > > Debian GNU/\s 3.0 \n \l > > > > www:/etc/mail# dpkg -S /etc/mail > > sendmail: /etc/mail > > Point taken. > > By default, however, Debian comes with exim, not sendmail. Sendmail (and > only sendmail) seems to use /etc/mail.
FreeBSD also has /etc/mail/mailer.conf, which controls the "mailwrapper" abstraction to sendmail. (mailwrapper is usually a symlink to /usr/sbin/sendmail). I don't mind /etc/mail/spamassassin, but agree that this should be admin-specifiable. I'd prefer /usr/local/etc/spamassassin, myself. -- Charlie Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frontier Internet, Inc. http://www.frontier.net/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
