On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:54:57PM -0800, Timothy Demarest wrote: > Duncan: > > Thanks for the comments. > > > > >I think it is perfectly acceptible to let the local admin decide where > >he/she wants to put files. Why restrict, especially when the performance > >gain/loss is so incredibly insignificant. > > > > I agree that it is acceptable to allow the admin to choose, but the current > install doesn't allow that. It doesn't even recognine the default paths > from your local perl installation. We're stuck with the hard coded paths in > the perl files, and are forced to make symlinks all over the file system. > > >Furthermore, this will break previously working systems on upgrade. For > >what reason? None. > > > > Well, we could keep the old path in there for historically purposes which > would allow older upgrades to continue to work while giving those willing > and option to use a cleaner structure. >
Don't save one for historical purposes. This implies that one is somehow 'right' and the other is 'wrong.' Support both equally. Define 'cleaner structure.' -- Duncan Findlay _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
