On 3/8/02 1:58 AM, "Matt Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've stated before that I personally am not interested in extending > SpamAssassin to be an anti-virus tool. We have here at work one of the > world's best AV tools (and written in Perl too), but the code for > detecting viruses is *very* different from detecting spam. I'm even > strongly considering removing the two or three rules in there so far that > are aimed at viruses. Ditto. I've been strongly considering removing those rules too. Especially since they're effectively out of date now anyway. In fact, they're now gone. C _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
