-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Thursday, 28. February 2002 18:36 schrieb Greg Ward: > First, I ran the 59 existing true positives through SA 2.1, looking for > any that scored < 5. There were four; three of them slipped by because > of DEAR_SOMEBODY scoring -4.4, and the fourth because of CASHCASHCASH > scoring -3.7. I changed both of these scores to 1.0, and now SA 2.1 > flags all of the spam flagged by SA 2.0.
Maybe SA needs to know some additional non-spam tests to compensate for successful spam tests? The current scores look to me as if the GA tried its best to avoid false positives which unfortunately contained some spam-specific content. (Maybe parts of this list's archive.) Maybe it would be more successful if there were other tests commonly successful with non-spam (eg. constructs found in mailing lists) which the GA could use to score down "regular" emails... Greetinx, Gunter Ohrner - -- +-+-+-+-+-+-+ PDEPP Webserver: http://pdepp.SourceForge.net/ +-+-+-+-+-+-+ The only way housework could be done in this place was with a shovel or, for preference, a match. -- (Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- http://www.lspace.org -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8fozt0ORHvREo8l8RAjPMAJ9mWc/ReswNnezCfBmwHBuJKag/AwCaAzo1 2YpGQ0JWiJzME8ghnBHcYIw= =Wcrq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
