At 12:36 PM 2/28/2002 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
>Here are my corrected scores, in no particular order.  These scores were
>derived using a highly sophisticated natural intelligence algorithm,
>namely gut instinct:
>
>  score DEAR_SOMEBODY           1.0  # was -4.4
>  score CASHCASHCASH            1.0  # was -3.7
>  score TO_BE_REMOVED_REPLY     1.5  # was -2.0
>  score MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ_REMOVE 2.5  # was -3.7
>  score MAILTO_TO_REMOVE        2.5  # was -1.1
>  score MSGID_HAS_NO_AT         1.0  # was -0.7
>  score MAILTO_LINK             1.0  # was -0.5
>  score EXCUSE_10               1.0  # was -1.4
>  score COPYRIGHT_CLAIMED       0.0  # was -3.1
>  score MAILTO_LINK             1.0  # was -0.5
>  score TO_BE_REMOVED_REPLY     2.0  # was -2.0
>  score TO_UNSUB_REPLY          2.0  # was -2.3
>  score SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS       1.5  # was  0.9
>  score VERY_SUSP_RECIPS        2.5  # was  0.9
>  score LARGE_HEX               1.5  # was -5.9

Using the same highly scientific algorithm I came up with a similar
(but larger) list of changes:

score 25FREEMEGS_URL                 1.0
score BE_AMAZED                      1.0
score CASHCASHCASH                   1.5
score CYBER_FIRE_POWER               2.0
score DEAR_SOMEBODY                  1.0
score GAPPY_TEXT                     1.5
score IN_ACCORDANCE_WITH_LAWS        2.0
score LOTS_OF_CC_LINES               1.5
score LARGE_HEX                      0.5
score MONSTERHUT                     2.0
score ONCE_IN_LIFETIME               2.0
score PROFITS                        2.0
score SECTION_301                    2.0
score SENT_IN_COMPLIANCE             2.0
score THIS_AINT_SPAM                 2.0
score TO_UNSUB_REPLY                 0.5
score UNSUB_PAGE                     0.7
score UNSUB_SCRIPT                   0.7
score US_DOLLARS                     3.0
score X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH         0.5

So far so good...

reb


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to